Have you planned how you're going to make successful sales?
If you haven't, it isn't too late -- but you're already behind the eight ball.
Here are 7 actions you must take and take now if you want to control your own
destiny:
1. Flush Out All of the Tail-Chasing
"Prospects" in Your System.
We all have "prospects" in our pipeline that take
up time and energy but that we know in our hearts will never buy. Get them out
of your system now. Don't spend any more of your precious time on them.
Concentrate on real prospects, not the "hope someday." Vow not to spend
any more time chasing your tail.
2. Get Organized.
Most of us spend as much or more time "organizing"
each day as we do working. Take a day or two and get yourself organized and
then 30 minutes each evening getting ready for the next day. Don't waste time
"getting ready" to sell.
3. Know Who a Real Prospect Is.
If you haven't already defined your ideal prospect(s) in
detail, do so now. Many salespeople waste a great deal of time chasing
unqualified prospects because they haven't taken the time to define for themselves
exactly who their real prospects are.
4. Focus Only on Real Prospects.
Even many who have defined in-detail who their real
prospects are, find themselves chasing after those who don't qualify. Commit
yourself to staying on track. Defining your prospect doesn't do any good if you
allow yourself to wander.
5. Eliminate the Success-Killing Busy Work.
If what you do isn't directly involved with finding
qualified prospects, making sales presentations and closing sales, or getting a
sale completed, it's busy work. Busy work may make you feel like you're
accomplishing something but it isn't making you a dime. If it doesn't make you
money, don't do it.
6. Learn to Generate Referrals.
Referrals are the best, most cost-effective prospecting and
marketing method there is. Nothing can beat referrals in terms of ROI, close
ratio, and client loyalty. Yet, few salespeople generate many quality
referrals. Less than 15% of all salespeople generate enough quality referrals
to impact their business. Learn the process that really generates a large
number of high-quality referrals and turn your clients into your marketing
platform.
7. Create a Consistent Client Communication Campaign.
If you don't already have a consistent communication
campaign for your clients and prospects, create one now. You should be touching
each of your clients and long-term prospects 12 to 16 times a year. Use a
combination of media, and make sure each of your communications brings value to
your client. The key question to ask yourself before making any contact is
"does this benefit the client or only me?" If it doesn't benefit the
client, don't send it or don't call. Never waste your client's time.
Time is short. But implementing these 7 "musts"
will get your sales on track.
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Friday, July 12, 2013
Broadcast Networks remain tops in "Must Keep TV"
ABC leads all networks viewers cannot live without.
ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC continue their grip on the top four positions on the list of top 10 TV brands that American consumers consider “Must Keep TV,” according to an annual survey by Solutions Research Group (SRG). It was a close race for number one, with ABC posting just a slight lead over CBS overall in the latest survey of 1,400 American consumers age 12+ in Spring 2013.The next five in the rankings are cable networks, with ESPN once again the top cable brand for American viewers and holding the number five spot overall for the fifth year in a row. There has been some shifting
in the ranks, though, with History moving up to sixth place, eclipsing seventh place Discovery for the first time as the top non-sports cable brand since 2007. HBO has rejoined the top 10 at number eight after two years outside the top echelon. USA is number nine, rounding out the cable top five. The final spot in the survey’s top 10 goes to another broadcast network, albeit a non-commercial one, PBS.
While the broadcast Big Four still top the list, SRG notes that fewer survey respondents list ABC, CBS, FOX or NBC as a network they can’t do without. Only 75% had one of the four on their “must keep” list this year. That’s down from the peak of 83% when Toronto-based SRG did its first U.S. survey in 2007.
Outside the top 10, SRG noted upward movement by A&E, climbing to #11 from #16 last year thanks to hits like Duck Dynasty and Storage Wars. AMC, home to The Walking Dead and Mad Men, shot up to #18 from #33. “HGTV is another cable brand to watch. It showed increases across all key demos,” said SRG. MTV, meanwhile, dropped out of the Top 20.
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Five Key Attributes of Salespeople
According to a survey of some 5,000 executives, conducted by
a joint team at the Sales Executive Council and Marketing Leadership Council,
respondents were asked to list 50 key attributes of salespeople in order of
importance. Here are the top five:
1. Offers unique and valuable perspectives on the market.
2. Helps me navigate alternatives.
3. Provides ongoing advice or consultation.
4. Helps me avoid potential land mines.
5. Educates me on new issues and outcomes.
Each of these attributes speaks directly to an urgent need of the customer not to buy something, but to learn something. They're looking for salespeople to help them identify new opportunities to cut costs, increase revenue, penetrate new markets and mitigate risks in ways they may not recognize.
The message from the customer is clear: "Challenge me. Teach me something new."
1. Offers unique and valuable perspectives on the market.
2. Helps me navigate alternatives.
3. Provides ongoing advice or consultation.
4. Helps me avoid potential land mines.
5. Educates me on new issues and outcomes.
Each of these attributes speaks directly to an urgent need of the customer not to buy something, but to learn something. They're looking for salespeople to help them identify new opportunities to cut costs, increase revenue, penetrate new markets and mitigate risks in ways they may not recognize.
The message from the customer is clear: "Challenge me. Teach me something new."
Friday, April 26, 2013
Don't Use Social to Generate Sales; Make Selling Social
'Fan-Led' Successes Are Built on Old-School Push Promotions
Some say we can't value social-marketing efforts directly. Others claim that if we can't attribute a return on investment, we shouldn't be doing it.
But maybe we're all missing the point. Maybe the problem is not whether social value can be measured in dollars. Perhaps the issue is that we can't measure in dollars objectives that weren't intended to be profitable in the first place.
Most CEOs and CMOs have a clearly defined objective to make money for their organization. Yet most social-marketing programs are still designed to create engagement, gain followers or generate Facebook likes. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that there's a disconnect there. Getting to an ROI figure from most social efforts doesn't take better analysis tools -- it simply takes the inclusion of objectives that are centered on generating profit.
Customer loyalty, advocacy, engagement, interest and awareness are all important in the marketing funnel, but the assumption that they supersede the "baser" activity of selling is pure hubris. If customers don't also desire "buying" relationships with us, then we have no business being in business.
We need to get to a better balance with our social-marketing efforts and speak to the entirety of the customer permission set, including how they want to buy from us. Only then can we form measurable profit objectives that intersect with these permissions. Because the object of social marketing is not simply to collect audience appreciation, but to make every customer experience shareable -- including the purchase.
For example, Zappos has been heralded as a "social brand." But that's not entirely true. Zappos is a "customer service" brand. The majority of its "social marketing" investment actually goes into hiring the right people and creating amazing customer experiences. I still talk about the time I sent an anonymous gift with Zappos. During the transaction, the operator fawned over me repeatedly for making such a wonderful gesture. It was a little embarrassing, but I was gratified. Then came the surprise, because over the next two weeks this operator shipped to me gift package after gift package of cookies, socks, books and even a messenger bag in appreciation of my act of kindness. It was amazing!
Sure, Zappos still collects "likes" for posts about new articles of clothing or holiday well-wishes. But it has a broader mission of making the sales experience personal, meaningful and ultimately shareable.
In a nutshell, Zappos doesn't do social to generate sales. Zappos makes selling social.
Further, the assumption that the spectrum of social media is being ruined by the "old" tactics of push selling is disingenuous. Push and pull always need to work together. We can say that Louis C.K. or Radiohead have proved that fan-led pull efforts are the new way to market. But have you noticed that nearly all of these "fan-led" successes are built on the backs of years and sometimes millions of dollars in old-school push promotions?
Going back to the Zappos example, it may use social to generate pleasant relationships, but it also buys a boatload of social ads that push product. What's more, it is one of those vendors that uses "stalking" ads that display the products you last looked at on its site. And frankly, despite the creepy factor, customers don't mind for the most part, because the relationship the company has built is centered on us buying stuff from it.
The real value of social to an organization is that it shreds the veil between marketing and operations. It puts on public display every customer touchpoint within the company. So we need to stop creating passive programs that simply use social media and start thinking of social marketing as a discipline of doing business in a manner customers want to share. Selling must be social. Because only then are we able to measure the profitability of social marketing.
(Source: Advertising Age, 04/17/13)
Some say we can't value social-marketing efforts directly. Others claim that if we can't attribute a return on investment, we shouldn't be doing it.
But maybe we're all missing the point. Maybe the problem is not whether social value can be measured in dollars. Perhaps the issue is that we can't measure in dollars objectives that weren't intended to be profitable in the first place.
Most CEOs and CMOs have a clearly defined objective to make money for their organization. Yet most social-marketing programs are still designed to create engagement, gain followers or generate Facebook likes. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that there's a disconnect there. Getting to an ROI figure from most social efforts doesn't take better analysis tools -- it simply takes the inclusion of objectives that are centered on generating profit.
Customer loyalty, advocacy, engagement, interest and awareness are all important in the marketing funnel, but the assumption that they supersede the "baser" activity of selling is pure hubris. If customers don't also desire "buying" relationships with us, then we have no business being in business.
We need to get to a better balance with our social-marketing efforts and speak to the entirety of the customer permission set, including how they want to buy from us. Only then can we form measurable profit objectives that intersect with these permissions. Because the object of social marketing is not simply to collect audience appreciation, but to make every customer experience shareable -- including the purchase.
For example, Zappos has been heralded as a "social brand." But that's not entirely true. Zappos is a "customer service" brand. The majority of its "social marketing" investment actually goes into hiring the right people and creating amazing customer experiences. I still talk about the time I sent an anonymous gift with Zappos. During the transaction, the operator fawned over me repeatedly for making such a wonderful gesture. It was a little embarrassing, but I was gratified. Then came the surprise, because over the next two weeks this operator shipped to me gift package after gift package of cookies, socks, books and even a messenger bag in appreciation of my act of kindness. It was amazing!
Sure, Zappos still collects "likes" for posts about new articles of clothing or holiday well-wishes. But it has a broader mission of making the sales experience personal, meaningful and ultimately shareable.
In a nutshell, Zappos doesn't do social to generate sales. Zappos makes selling social.
Further, the assumption that the spectrum of social media is being ruined by the "old" tactics of push selling is disingenuous. Push and pull always need to work together. We can say that Louis C.K. or Radiohead have proved that fan-led pull efforts are the new way to market. But have you noticed that nearly all of these "fan-led" successes are built on the backs of years and sometimes millions of dollars in old-school push promotions?
Going back to the Zappos example, it may use social to generate pleasant relationships, but it also buys a boatload of social ads that push product. What's more, it is one of those vendors that uses "stalking" ads that display the products you last looked at on its site. And frankly, despite the creepy factor, customers don't mind for the most part, because the relationship the company has built is centered on us buying stuff from it.
The real value of social to an organization is that it shreds the veil between marketing and operations. It puts on public display every customer touchpoint within the company. So we need to stop creating passive programs that simply use social media and start thinking of social marketing as a discipline of doing business in a manner customers want to share. Selling must be social. Because only then are we able to measure the profitability of social marketing.
(Source: Advertising Age, 04/17/13)
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
U.S. Digital TV Users Soaring
U.S.
digital TV users are climbing faster than expected.
The number of U.S. digital TV users -- those who view at least one TV show per month via the Internet -- will climb 37% in four years to 145 million in 2017, from 106 million in 2012. This amounts to digital TV user growth climbing at a 6.9% compound annual growth rate -- a higher increase than previously forecast in August 2012 by eMarketer.
Next year, it says digital TV viewers will cross a critical tipping point -- surpassing 50% of the U.S. Internet user population. Those users who watch at least one movie per month on any Internet-capable device will climb to 115 million in 2017 from nearly 80 million in 2012, a 9.7% annual growth rate.
A Belkin and Harris Interactive survey of U.S. Internet users said 12% would consider replacing their cable or satellite subscription with a streaming media subscription, such as Netflix or Hulu Plus in 2013. A total of 30% of respondents were inclined to at least consider cord-cutting.
Still, another 37% "strongly disagreed" when asked whether they would consider replacing cable and satellite with only digital Internet TV.
Evidence of growing digital TV/movie usage, says eMarketer, comes from Netflix -- which reported U.S. streaming revenues of $2.19 billion for 2012, growing moderately from quarter-to-quarter, with its U.S. rental DVD revenues totaling $1.14 billion and declining each quarter.
The number of U.S. digital TV users -- those who view at least one TV show per month via the Internet -- will climb 37% in four years to 145 million in 2017, from 106 million in 2012. This amounts to digital TV user growth climbing at a 6.9% compound annual growth rate -- a higher increase than previously forecast in August 2012 by eMarketer.
Next year, it says digital TV viewers will cross a critical tipping point -- surpassing 50% of the U.S. Internet user population. Those users who watch at least one movie per month on any Internet-capable device will climb to 115 million in 2017 from nearly 80 million in 2012, a 9.7% annual growth rate.
A Belkin and Harris Interactive survey of U.S. Internet users said 12% would consider replacing their cable or satellite subscription with a streaming media subscription, such as Netflix or Hulu Plus in 2013. A total of 30% of respondents were inclined to at least consider cord-cutting.
Still, another 37% "strongly disagreed" when asked whether they would consider replacing cable and satellite with only digital Internet TV.
Evidence of growing digital TV/movie usage, says eMarketer, comes from Netflix -- which reported U.S. streaming revenues of $2.19 billion for 2012, growing moderately from quarter-to-quarter, with its U.S. rental DVD revenues totaling $1.14 billion and declining each quarter.
Wayne Friedman - Media Daily News
'Listening' for the Solution
If you're talking, you're not listening, and as a result
you're not learning anything that you'll need to reply in a way that progresses
a sale, you're not earning your prospect's trust, and you certainly won't earn
the right to ask for the business.
Ideally, you should talk 20 percent of the time; ask questions and listen 80 percent of the time. Then and only then can you tailor your sales presentation to the prospect's real needs, and in the process, earn their trust and the right to close the sale.
Keep your questions brief and concise. The more complex the question, the less likely you are to get the information you need. Simple sentences generate complex answers, and this is what you want to hear because the customer will be telling you how to solve their problem, but you'll hear it only if you're really listening and not multi-tasking mentally.
Until you know what they do, how they do it, where, when, with whom and why, you have no business -- or credibility -- telling them how you can help them to do it better.
Ideally, you should talk 20 percent of the time; ask questions and listen 80 percent of the time. Then and only then can you tailor your sales presentation to the prospect's real needs, and in the process, earn their trust and the right to close the sale.
Keep your questions brief and concise. The more complex the question, the less likely you are to get the information you need. Simple sentences generate complex answers, and this is what you want to hear because the customer will be telling you how to solve their problem, but you'll hear it only if you're really listening and not multi-tasking mentally.
Until you know what they do, how they do it, where, when, with whom and why, you have no business -- or credibility -- telling them how you can help them to do it better.
Monday, March 4, 2013
The Socialization of Ads: How Twitter and Facebook Are Focusing on Marketers
Sir Martin Sorrell, WPP Group CEO, says Twitter is a "PR medium," not an advertising one (and neither is Facebook). His comments follow Twitter's launch of its advertising API touted as a booster for marketers to manage campaigns.
"If you look at the Olympics in London, the big winner was Twitter. It wasn't Facebook. It wasn't even Google. We did analyses of the Twitter feeds every day, and it's very, very potent. But I think because it's limited in terms of number of characters, it reduces communication to superficialities and lacks depth."
Undaunted, Twitter is forging ahead and fashioning itself as an ad platform. Its API launch partners include Adobe, HootSuite, Salesforce, SHIFT and TBG Digital. Aside from creating a larger revenue base for Twitter, the API could lead to more ads on the site and apps which is worrisome to users.
"Launching an ad based API does not mean we've changed our philosophy or that a user will see more ads in their experience," said April Underwood, product manager, revenue at Twitter. "From a user standpoint it doesn't mean we're becoming more aggressive in terms of ads or altering the user experience at all. This is all about giving marketers more choice as well as a broader set of tools in their arsenal that they can use in how they want to work with us."
With this latest change, businesses will be able to work with Twitter's partner companies to create more in-depth and targeted ad campaigns to run on Twitter, as well as integrate Twitter advertising into broader marketing strategies across a variety of sites and platforms.
"Slowly, but in plain sight, Twitter has opened a marketing window that didn't exist before, a window that allows marketers -- or anyone -- to exploit, in real time, moments both expected and completely unplanned," notes AdAge. Twitter Revenue Chief Adam Bain added, "Marketing has evolved to a series of 'now moments,' and we are the platform that can deliver that moment."
In another move to promote simplicity and ease, Twitter has introduced the mobile video app, Vine. According to creative director Rus Yusupov, "An interface should get out of the way." Vine doesn't even have a play button. The interface is slick, perfect for quick-hit responses or campaigns in terms of advertisers. "At the very least, it offers a fresh way to share a promotion or a response, give people a look behind the scenes or an imaginative expression of what the brand believes in. This is advertising, just not as we know it." Vine simply adds another dimension to Twitter's advertising arsenal and certainly gives marketers using the platform a leg up on the competition.
Speaking of competition, Facebook began testing its own advertising API in 2009, allowing marketers to create automated campaigns integrating multiple ad products as well as tools for measuring the impact of the ads, the best time to run them and which groups to target.
Facebook is testing "different sizes based on connectedness," notes AllFacebook.com. "News feed ads coming from brands that users or their friends have liked will still show up large, but ads coming from pages that neither users nor their friends have liked will show up smaller." This adjustment is a welcome one, as users of the social site are oft to complain about the increasing amount of ads and promotions showing up smack in the middle of their friends' status updates, no longer restricted to the right sidebar.
On the mobile front, Facebook is tweaking sponsored stories and application install ads in the mobile news feed including a new like icon and for iOS users, the header, "Suggested App."
Sorrell, however, is not convinced. "Facebook to my mind is not an advertising medium. It is a branding medium. So if I can get you to say something nice about WPP or me or one of our companies on Facebook to your wife, your friends, or whoever, that's good."
A "number one ranking on Google seems more important than a Facebook 'like.' This doesn't deny the potency of Facebook. But it has to be seen in the context of a long continuum of brand building."
(Source: BrandChannel, 02/26/13)
"If you look at the Olympics in London, the big winner was Twitter. It wasn't Facebook. It wasn't even Google. We did analyses of the Twitter feeds every day, and it's very, very potent. But I think because it's limited in terms of number of characters, it reduces communication to superficialities and lacks depth."
Undaunted, Twitter is forging ahead and fashioning itself as an ad platform. Its API launch partners include Adobe, HootSuite, Salesforce, SHIFT and TBG Digital. Aside from creating a larger revenue base for Twitter, the API could lead to more ads on the site and apps which is worrisome to users.
"Launching an ad based API does not mean we've changed our philosophy or that a user will see more ads in their experience," said April Underwood, product manager, revenue at Twitter. "From a user standpoint it doesn't mean we're becoming more aggressive in terms of ads or altering the user experience at all. This is all about giving marketers more choice as well as a broader set of tools in their arsenal that they can use in how they want to work with us."
With this latest change, businesses will be able to work with Twitter's partner companies to create more in-depth and targeted ad campaigns to run on Twitter, as well as integrate Twitter advertising into broader marketing strategies across a variety of sites and platforms.
"Slowly, but in plain sight, Twitter has opened a marketing window that didn't exist before, a window that allows marketers -- or anyone -- to exploit, in real time, moments both expected and completely unplanned," notes AdAge. Twitter Revenue Chief Adam Bain added, "Marketing has evolved to a series of 'now moments,' and we are the platform that can deliver that moment."
In another move to promote simplicity and ease, Twitter has introduced the mobile video app, Vine. According to creative director Rus Yusupov, "An interface should get out of the way." Vine doesn't even have a play button. The interface is slick, perfect for quick-hit responses or campaigns in terms of advertisers. "At the very least, it offers a fresh way to share a promotion or a response, give people a look behind the scenes or an imaginative expression of what the brand believes in. This is advertising, just not as we know it." Vine simply adds another dimension to Twitter's advertising arsenal and certainly gives marketers using the platform a leg up on the competition.
Speaking of competition, Facebook began testing its own advertising API in 2009, allowing marketers to create automated campaigns integrating multiple ad products as well as tools for measuring the impact of the ads, the best time to run them and which groups to target.
Facebook is testing "different sizes based on connectedness," notes AllFacebook.com. "News feed ads coming from brands that users or their friends have liked will still show up large, but ads coming from pages that neither users nor their friends have liked will show up smaller." This adjustment is a welcome one, as users of the social site are oft to complain about the increasing amount of ads and promotions showing up smack in the middle of their friends' status updates, no longer restricted to the right sidebar.
On the mobile front, Facebook is tweaking sponsored stories and application install ads in the mobile news feed including a new like icon and for iOS users, the header, "Suggested App."
Sorrell, however, is not convinced. "Facebook to my mind is not an advertising medium. It is a branding medium. So if I can get you to say something nice about WPP or me or one of our companies on Facebook to your wife, your friends, or whoever, that's good."
A "number one ranking on Google seems more important than a Facebook 'like.' This doesn't deny the potency of Facebook. But it has to be seen in the context of a long continuum of brand building."
(Source: BrandChannel, 02/26/13)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






